Venture Capital & Startup Funding Roundup, June 30, 2026
It’s Tuesday, June 30, 2026, and today’s venture funding tells a clear story: investors are no longer paying simply for AI. They’re backing the infrastructure, software, and specialized hardware that make AI useful inside real businesses. The strongest rounds announced in the last 12 hours clustered around systems that make AI usable in the real economy: governed communications, semiconductor timing, machine health, homebuilding workflows, and front-office automation for small businesses. Even the healthcare rounds fit the same logic. Investors were not paying for vague “AI exposure.” They were paying for software and hardware that sit inside regulated, expensive, failure-sensitive workflows where buyers will tolerate real budgets if the product saves time, raises throughput, or reduces operational risk.
At the same time, biotech reminded the market that capital still moves in size when the science is paired with timing and syndicate conviction. Beeline pulled in a $126.3 million Series A extension ahead of a key lupus readout, while Flare Therapeutics raised $85 million in an insider-led Series C to focus on a prostate cancer program already cleared to enter the clinic. That is not a broad-based life sciences reopening. It is a much narrower signal: investors will still write very large checks when clinical milestones are visible, the asset package is differentiated, and insiders are willing to defend the company before public data arrives.
Across the 10 rounds below, disclosed newly announced capital totaled about $618 million. Nearly four-fifths of that came from just four companies, which says as much about today’s market as the rounds themselves: funding is available, but it is concentrated, thematic, and increasingly tied to execution rather than broad category bets.
This report uses a strict 12-hour announcement window in U.S. Eastern time. I excluded older rounds resurfaced in republished stories and financings without enough public detail to support a high-confidence write-up.
The Macro Environment: AI Moves From Model Hype to Operational Spend
The broader backdrop still matters. Crunchbase reported that global startup funding hit a record $300 billion in the first quarter of 2026, with the surge driven primarily by AI. That flood of capital has not made investors less selective. It has made them more willing to invest capital in companies that control a chokepoint in the AI stack, whether that chokepoint is compute, data governance, physical infrastructure, or a hard-to-replace enterprise workflow.
That concentration showed up clearly today. LeapXpert, Higharc, Stathera, Omen AI, Pie, and Queue each attack a different bottleneck, but all of them sit one step away from the foundation-model race itself. They are enabling the governed conversation layer, the spatial workflow layer, the chip timing layer, the machine-health layer, the small-business conversion layer, or the robotic execution layer. In other words, capital is moving into the operating system around AI, not just the model layer at the center of headlines.
Physical infrastructure is an especially important piece of the story. The International Energy Agency projects that data-center electricity consumption will more than double to around 945 TWh by 2030, with AI the main driver of that increase. When power, cooling, synchronization, and uptime become binding constraints, money naturally follows businesses that can keep high-density systems stable and economical. That is the hidden thread connecting Stathera’s silicon timing round, Omen’s fluid-analysis financing, and even parts of Higharc’s built-world software story.
The other notable pattern is syndicate quality. Today’s checks were led by firms and strategic investors with a clear reason to be there: Insight Partners in construction software, Riverwood in growth-stage enterprise technology, Maverick Silicon in semiconductors, AlleyCorp in operational automation, Bain Capital and CPP Investments in advanced biotech, and insider-heavy support at Flare. This is not a tourist capital. It looks like specialist money is allocated into categories where diligence requires domain depth.
The Ten Most Important Funding Rounds
LeapXpert raises $180 million to govern enterprise messaging and turn conversations into AI-ready data

LeapXpert today announced a $180 million growth investment led by Riverwood Capital, underscoring growing investor confidence in its governed communication intelligence platform. LeapXpert’s round was the day’s clearest signal that enterprise AI is moving deeper into the recordkeeping and compliance layer. The company sells governed communications infrastructure that captures and manages business conversations across the messaging channels employees and clients already use. That sounds like a niche until you remember how much revenue generation, client servicing, and regulated decision-making have shifted from email toward WhatsApp, iMessage, SMS, Signal, and similar apps. Riverwood Capital is not funding a better chat interface here. It is funding the data and control layer that enables enterprises to use those channels without sacrificing governance.
Why this matters now is straightforward. AI is only as useful as the data an enterprise can safely see, structure, and act on. LeapXpert’s pitch is that governed conversation data is among the largest, most underused enterprise datasets. The company says hundreds of organizations across financial services, government, and the Forbes Global 2000 already rely on it, and Riverwood’s thesis is that communication software has moved from archiving to governance to intelligence. That makes this round less about messaging compliance as a cost center and more about conversation data as an asset with workflow and AI value.
There is also a scale signal here. LeapXpert had previously announced a $22 million Series A+ in 2023 and a $20 million Series B in 2025. A jump to a $180 million growth investment suggests investors now see the company as a category-scale enterprise platform rather than a feature company serving one regulated niche.
Funding Details
Startup: LeapXpert
Investors: Riverwood Capital; existing investor Portage Ventures highlighted in the announcement as a continuing backer
Amount Raised: $180 million
Total Raised: Not fully disclosed in today’s announcement
Funding Stage: Growth investment
Funding Date: June 30, 2026
Headquarters: New York, New York
Sector: Enterprise communications, compliance, AI software.
Beeline Medicines raises $126.3 million to push autoimmune drugs toward pivotal development
Beeline’s Series A extension is one of the biggest funding tells of the day because it is insider-heavy and milestone-driven. The company closed a $126.3 million extension to its previously announced $300 million Series A, bringing the total Series A to $426.3 million. Existing backers, including Bain Capital, CPP Investments, and Bristol Myers Squibb, added more capital ahead of an anticipated Phase 2 readout for afimetoran in systemic lupus erythematosus. That kind of extension, at that size, is usually less about balance-sheet padding than about deciding the upcoming data window is worth buying into before everyone else can price it.
Investors are also backing a company structure they understand. BioPharma Dive noted that Beeline was built around assets licensed from Bristol Myers and fits Bain’s playbook of forming companies around more advanced pharma-originated programs. That is attractive in a market where preclinical platform stories still get funded, but near-term clinical proof can quickly separate good biotech from capital sinkholes. Afimetoran is the lead asset, but the company is also advancing BLN-326, lomedeucitinib, BLN-481, and a fifth preclinical program. Today’s round matters because it buys time and flexibility across a portfolio, not just a single binary event.
The bigger message for founders is that biotech financing is not dead; it is conditional. The market is rewarding companies that can show a visible path from licensed or internally developed science to late-stage studies, especially when top-tier insiders are willing to double down before the readout is public.
Funding Details
Startup: Beeline Medicines
Investors: Bain Capital, CPP Investments, Bristol Myers Squibb, and certain members of management
Amount Raised: $126.3 million
Total Raised: $426.3 million Series A total
Funding Stage: Series A extension
Funding Date: June 30, 2026
Headquarters: Stamford, Connecticut, and Boston, Massachusetts
Sector: Biotech, autoimmune and inflammatory disease therapeutics.
Higharc raises $95 million to bring AI deeper into homebuilding and materials distribution

Higharc has raised a $95 million Series C led by Insight Partners, bringing its total funding to more than $170 million. The company develops AI-powered software for the homebuilding design-to-construction lifecycle. Higharc is one of the day’s most strategically interesting software rounds because it pushes AI into a part of the economy where mistakes are expensive, spatial reasoning matters, and labor remains stubbornly manual.
The company positions itself as the homebuilding AI platform from design through construction, and the round comes with a major commercial expansion: a partnership with US LBM to bring AI estimating into the building materials supply chain. That is much more interesting than a generic “construction tech” label. It means Higharc is trying to become the data model that connects builders and suppliers rather than just another design tool.
The operating metrics in the announcement help explain why Insight Partners led the round. Higharc says customers have compressed product development timelines from months or years to weeks or days, cut time to community open by 25% to 50%, and increased margin by 10% to 15%. Those are not vanity metrics. They speak directly to the economics of land development, permitting, materials planning, and cycle time. The company’s core argument is that most AI systems fail on spatial reasoning, while housing actually requires a structured 3D data foundation that reflects code requirements, construction standards, and geometry. That is the sort of domain-specific data advantage investors still pay for.
What gives the round broader meaning is that AI is showing up here as workflow compression, not conversational novelty. Residential construction is a huge market with fragmented software, deep coordination problems, and thin margins. A company that can become the common operating layer for builders and distributors may have much stronger defensibility than a broad productivity tool with no proprietary context.
Funding Details
Startup: Higharc
Investors: Insight Partners; Wellington Management; Fifth Wall; Spark Capital; Lux Capital; SE Ventures; Simpson Strong-Tie; PSP Partners; RXR Arden Digital Ventures; Suffolk Technologies; Vertex Ventures; NC Tweener Fund; MetaProp
Amount Raised: $95 million
Total Raised: More than $170 million
Funding Stage: Series C
Funding Date: June 30, 2026
Headquarters: Durham, North Carolina
Sector: Construction software, AI, proptech.
Flare Therapeutics raises $85 million to narrow its biotech bet around prostate cancer
Flare’s Series C is a useful counterpoint to Beeline. Where Beeline was raised to keep advancing a broad autoimmune portfolio, Flare was raised to focus. The company said it had completed a strategic review and will concentrate resources on FX-111, its AR_ON degrader for prostate cancer, while also advancing an AR_ON RIPTAC program in preclinical development. The round was led by existing investors, including Third Rock Ventures and Nextech Invest, with support from Pfizer Ventures, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Casdin, Boxer, Invus, and others. That combination of strategic review and insider-led financing is usually a sign that investors still believe in the platform but want capital allocated to the clearest path to value creation.
The timing helps. Flare said FX-111 has already received FDA IND clearance and that Phase 1A clinical development is expected to begin in the third quarter of 2026. In a tougher biotech market, investors often want one thing above all: a credible path from platform story to product story. Flare is trying to make that transition explicit. Instead of underwriting a broad ambition around transcription factors, this round underwrites a narrower thesis around a differentiated prostate cancer mechanism entering human studies.
That makes this round important beyond the dollars. It reinforces that good biotech financings in 2026 are often about sequencing, focus, and insider support. Capital is available, but it is following sharper narratives than the platform-everything era.
Funding Details
Startup: Flare Therapeutics
Investors: Third Rock Ventures, Nextech Invest, Pfizer Ventures, Boxer Capital, GordonMD Global Investments, Invus, Casdin Capital, Eli Lilly and Company, Novartis, Agent Capital, Eventide Asset Management
Amount Raised: $85 million
Total Raised: Not disclosed in today’s announcement
Funding Stage: Series C
Funding Date: June 30, 2026
Headquarters: Cambridge, Massachusetts
Sector: Biotech, oncology.
Stathera raises $55 million to sell the clock signal behind AI compute
Stathera’s Series B is a reminder that AI infrastructure is not only about GPUs, networking, and power generation. Timing matters too. The Montreal company develops silicon timing technology, effectively clocks for computing systems, and says the new funding will help it mass-produce second-generation components and expand closer to customers via a Silicon Valley office. The round was oversubscribed, led by Maverick Silicon, and brought total funding to $75 million.
Why investors care is simple: as compute systems scale, synchronization, power efficiency, and integration become more valuable. BetaKit reported that Stathera is pitching MEMS-based timing as an alternative to traditional quartz and framed SiTime as the major incumbent in the category. That makes this a classic infrastructure bet on a part of the semiconductor stack that most non-specialists ignore until system requirements get hard enough to matter. AI data center demand is making those requirements harder to meet.
This is also a geopolitical and industrial signal. In a year when several Canadian semiconductor businesses have either moved south or been absorbed by U.S. companies, Stathera is raising semiconductor-focused American capital while keeping the company’s center of gravity in Montreal. That matters for founders building hardware outside Silicon Valley’s immediate orbit: the money will travel when the wedge is technical enough, and the customer pull is evident.
Funding Details
Startup: Stathera
Investors: Maverick Silicon; Celesta Capital; BDC Capital; MediaTek Innovation Fund; TXC Corporation; Ultratech Capital Partners
Amount Raised: $55 million
Total Raised: $75 million
Funding Stage: Series B
Funding Date: June 30, 2026
Headquarters: Montreal, Canada
Sector: Semiconductors, AI infrastructure.
Omen AI raises $31 million to monitor the machines that keep AI infrastructure running
Omen AI is a strong example of where the next wave of AI infrastructure money is going: not only into chips, but into the systems that keep physical machines from failing under high utilization. The company builds continuous fluid-analysis sensors that attach directly to a machine’s fluid system and monitor wear patterns, metal content, contamination, and degradation in real time. Its $31 million Series A was led by Nava Ventures, bringing total funding to $41.5 million. Omen says its systems are already deployed in data centers managing 10 to 14 gigawatts of capacity, as well as industrial fleets across North America.
That deployment footprint is the heart of the investment case. Once data-center uptime becomes the gating factor for AI economics, predictive maintenance stops being a nice-to-have. It becomes part of cost control, capacity planning, and risk reduction. Omen is effectively trying to digitize machine health in environments where downtime is expensive and scheduled testing is too blunt an instrument. That is a good place to stand if you want investors to believe you are selling must-have infrastructure rather than optional analytics.
The sector implication is bigger than Omen. As AI capacity expands, the investable surface area around compute keeps widening. Cooling, fluids, redundancy, and maintenance are now part of the finance story, which helps explain why specialist investors are willing to fund businesses that would have looked industrial rather than “AI” a few years ago.
Funding Details
Startup: Omen AI
Investors: Nava Ventures; CRV; Sheryl Sandberg; Mike Mattacola; Vanderbilt University; LMNT Ventures; Mann+Hummel; Borusan Ventures; Starhill Holdings; Hard Launch Capital; executives from Bridgestone, GM, Johnson Controls, and TensorWave
Amount Raised: $31 million
Total Raised: $41.5 million
Funding Stage: Series A
Funding Date: June 30, 2026
Headquarters: San Francisco, California
Sector: Industrial AI, machine health, data-center infrastructure.
Pie raises $19.5 million to bring AI growth tooling to small businesses
Pie came out of stealth with a $19.5 million Series A led by Lightspeed Venture Partners, bringing total funding to $23.7 million. The company’s framing is straightforward: many small businesses are not struggling because they lack good service, but because they are increasingly hard to discover, reach, and convert across digital channels. Pie wants to solve that with AI tools focused on growth, local discovery, and customer conversion, including a newly launched product called Front Desk that answers calls for small-business owners.
Investors like this sort of company when it is not selling “AI for SMBs” in the abstract, but rather a very narrow workflow with obvious ROI. Front-desk phone coverage, customer acquisition, and conversion are all closely tied to revenue. That matters because Main Street businesses do not buy software the same way Fortune 500 companies do. The product has to feel like labor substitution or revenue lift, not a strategic platform project. Lightspeed, Capital One Ventures, and Max Levchin’s SciFi VC are betting Pie can package AI in a way the SMB market will actually pay for.
The round also broadens the day’s thesis. Not every AI dollar today went toward hyperscale infrastructure or enterprise governance. Some of it went toward making AI legible to smaller operators who need immediate utility. That is a healthier sign for software demand than another model-adjacent funding headline would have been.
Funding Details
Startup: Pie
Investors: Lightspeed Venture Partners; Capital One Ventures; SciFi VC; F-Prime; Commerce Ventures; WEX Venture Capital; existing investors
Amount Raised: $19.5 million
Total Raised: $23.7 million
Funding Stage: Series A
Funding Date: June 30, 2026
Headquarters: New York, New York
Sector: AI software, SMB growth and customer conversion.
Queue raises $12.6 million to automate prescription fulfillment with a robotic pharmacy system

Queue’s seed round stands out because it sits at the intersection of robotics, healthcare operations, and labor efficiency. The company emerged from stealth with a working system designed to automate prescription dispensing, verification, and delivery, and said it had closed an oversubscribed $12.6 million seed round led by AlleyCorp, following a $6 million pre-seed round led by Riot Ventures less than a year earlier. Total funding now stands at $18.6 million.
There is a real market reason for this timing. Retail and outpatient pharmacy workflows are operationally heavy, compliance-sensitive, and chronically labor-constrained. A fully autonomous robotic pharmacy is ambitious, but it points venture capital at a more attractive target than many digital-health front ends: a workflow with direct throughput value, lower error tolerance, and clear unit-economics upside if the automation works reliably. That raises the stakes technically, but it also makes the revenue case easier to understand.
Strategically, Queue fits the same pattern as Higharc and Omen. Investors are warming to companies that use software, hardware, and automation to compress real-world workflows, especially in places where wage inflation and reliability problems make manual work more expensive.
Funding Details
Startup: Queue
Investors: AlleyCorp; Riot Ventures; additional investors not fully visible in the Business Wire index excerpt
Amount Raised: $12.6 million
Total Raised: $18.6 million
Funding Stage: Seed
Funding Date: June 30, 2026
Headquarters: Palo Alto, California
Sector: Robotics, healthtech, pharmacy automation.
Pictor raises $7.5 million to commercialize multi-analyte proteomics
Pictor’s bridge round is modest compared with the headline-grabbing checks above, but it is strategically important because it funds commercialization rather than pure research. The company closed a $7.5 million bridge round supported by existing investors, bringing total capital raised to roughly $30 million. Pictor says its platform lets laboratories analyze up to 20 protein targets from a single sample in under two hours, reducing both workflow complexity and per-sample costs across pharma, reference-lab, and animal-health markets.
That commercial focus matters. According to the company, it has already launched seven products, secured four strategic partnerships, and expects to enter licensing stages with multiple partners within the next 12 to 18 months. In a market where investors are far less patient with open-ended “platform” stories, Pictor is selling a more concrete proposition: pay to get from early market traction to a financing event or partnerable scale. That is a very different flavor of biotech and diagnostics funding from the more binary rounds at Beeline and Flare, but it belongs in the same roundup because it shows that capital is still backing translational infrastructure.
For founders, this is a useful reminder that bridge rounds are not always defensive. Sometimes they are the cheapest source of capital to get a company through the final commercial proof points before a larger Series A or licensing outcome.
Funding Details
Startup: Pictor Holdings
Investors: Existing investors
Amount Raised: $7.5 million
Total Raised: Approximately $30 million
Funding Stage: Bridge round
Funding Date: June 30, 2026
Headquarters: Carlsbad, California
Sector: Proteomics, diagnostics infrastructure, biotech tools.
Qashier raises $6.125 million to expand a profitable merchant operating system in Southeast Asia
Qashier’s Series A+ is one of the day’s best capital-efficiency rounds. The Singapore company raised $6.125 million in a mix of equity and debt led by Cocoon Capital, IFP Securities, and BlackSoil Global. The company says it processes $1 billion in annualized payment volume for more than 20,000 merchants across Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, and the Philippines, has been profitable every month since December 2025, and has reached this scale with under $20 million raised to date.
That profile is exactly why this round matters despite being much smaller than the biotech and infrastructure financings above. Qashier is not pitching speculative fintech disruption. It is pitching an integrated merchant stack across payments, software, CRM, and embedded financial services, while also owning enough of the payment flow to generate proprietary data. That data already powers a revenue-based lending product, QashierLoans, which has disbursed more than $10 million to over 100 SMEs since its launch. In other words, the company is trying to become an operating infrastructure for Southeast Asian commerce, not just another point-of-sale vendor.
The lesson here is that investors are still willing to fund fintech when licensing, profitability, and distribution work together. In a year dominated by AI headlines, Qashier is a useful reminder that boring-looking infrastructure with real revenue can still be one of the smartest places for venture money.
Funding Details
Startup: Qashier
Investors: Cocoon Capital; IFP Securities; BlackSoil Global; strategic angel investors
Amount Raised: $6.125 million
Total Raised: Under $20 million raised to date, according to the company
Funding Stage: Series A+
Funding Date: June 30, 2026
Headquarters: Singapore
Sector: Fintech, merchant software, payments infrastructure.
What Today’s Funding Activity Reveals
The clearest pattern is that investors are paying for infrastructure that sits close to revenue and risk. LeapXpert governs message flows that enterprises need for compliance and AI; Higharc turns housing design and estimating into structured data; Stathera and Omen serve the hidden mechanical needs of compute buildouts; Queue tackles the labor and accuracy problem in pharmacy fulfillment; and Pie sells front-office automation directly attached to customer conversion. This is not a day dominated by speculative foundation-model copycats. It is a day dominated by companies that plug into existing budgets and fix expensive bottlenecks.
The second pattern is concentration. The top four rounds in this report accounted for about 79% of disclosed new capital, which is a sharp reminder that the venture market remains open but unequal. Founders should not confuse “capital is flowing again” with “capital is broadly available.” Investors are still clustering around companies with specialist syndicates, unusually strong insider support, or a clear claim to a hard-market bottleneck.
The third pattern is that biotech has not disappeared; it has just become more selective. Beeline and Flare together drew more than $211 million in new capital announced today, and both rounds were backed heavily by insiders and specialist investors around visible development milestones. Pictor added a different flavor of life-sciences capital by financing commercialization and licensing preparation instead of a pure R&D sprint. That mix suggests biotech money is still available when a company can explain exactly what the next tranche of capital will buy.
Geographically, the activity was global but not diffuse. The U.S. led the biggest checks, Canada showed up with deep-tech semiconductor funding, and Singapore contributed a profitable fintech infrastructure round. That fits a wider market where the largest AI and enterprise checks still cluster in North America, while other regions break through when they offer either domain specialization or strong regional operating moats.
Comparative Funding Table
| Startup | Amount Raised | Sector | Funding Stage | Lead Investors | Country |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LeapXpert | $180M | Enterprise communications, compliance, AI software | Growth | Riverwood Capital | United States |
| Beeline Medicines | $126.3M | Biotech, autoimmune, and inflammatory disease | Series A extension | Existing shareholders, including Bain Capital, CPP Investments, and Bristol Myers Squibb | United States |
| Higharc | $95M | Construction software, AI | Series C | Insight Partners | United States |
| Flare Therapeutics | $85M | Biotech, oncology | Series C | Third Rock Ventures, Nextech Invest | United States |
| Stathera | $55M | Semiconductors, AI infrastructure | Series B | Maverick Silicon | Canada |
| Omen AI | $31M | Industrial AI, machine health, data-center infrastructure | Series A | Nava Ventures | United States |
| Pie | $19.5M | AI software for SMB growth | Series A | Lightspeed Venture Partners | United States |
| Queue | $12.6M | Robotics, healthtech, pharmacy automation | Seed | AlleyCorp | United States |
| Pictor Holdings | $7.5M | Proteomics, diagnostics infrastructure | Bridge | Existing investors | United States |
| Qashier | $6.125M | Fintech, merchant software, payments infrastructure | Series A+ | Cocoon Capital, IFP Securities, BlackSoil Global | Singapore |
Strategic Takeaways for Founders and Investors
For founders, the message is blunt: the safest way to raise in this market is to solve a painful problem inside an existing budget, not to sell a generic AI wrapper. Today’s winners are attached to compliance, construction, semiconductors, biotech development milestones, merchant payments, and pharmacy operations. They reduce downtime, improve conversion, accelerate design cycles, or advance a clinical asset toward a clear value inflection. That is a much stronger story than broad efficiency claims without a hard operational wedge.
For investors, the day reinforces that defensibility is shifting away from user interface and toward data structure, workflow position, and physical integration. Higharc’s edge is spatial housing data, LeapXpert’s edge is governed conversation capture, Qashier’s edge is owning the merchant transaction stack, Omen’s edge is direct machine-level monitoring, and Stathera’s edge is technical control over a small but indispensable semiconductor function. These are the kinds of positions that look better when AI models themselves become cheaper and more widely available.
There is also a financing-structure lesson. Large insider-supported rounds in biotech and bridge-style commercialization capital in proteomics suggest that capital efficiency is being judged differently by sector. Software investors still want growth with clear expansion logic; biotech investors want milestone visibility and syndicate conviction; fintech investors want proof of disciplined unit economics and regulatory progress. Founders who pitch all investor audiences the same way are likely to miss the real underwriting logic.
Finally, beware of the risk of AI commoditization. The application layer is getting crowded. The companies that stood out today were not the ones promising broad intelligence. They were the ones with proprietary context, industry-specific control points, or physical-world integration. That is where pricing power is more likely to hold.
Conclusion
Today’s funding flow points to a venture market that is less interested in AI as spectacle and more interested in AI as infrastructure, control, and execution. The biggest checks went to companies building the systems around modern enterprise communication, the physical constraints of compute, and the structured workflows of housing and healthcare. The large biotech rounds, meanwhile, showed that science still attracts capital when the path from financing to clinical proof is visible.
That combination matters. Venture is not simply rotating into one sector. It is concentrating on companies that can turn technological change into operating leverage. Founders should read that as both an opportunity and a warning: money is still there, but it increasingly goes to businesses that can explain exactly why a customer must buy now, why the product is hard to replace, and why the next round of capital creates a sharper company rather than just a larger one.
Open questions and limitations
Valuation data was not publicly disclosed for most of the rounds announced in this window, so valuation signaling remains incomplete. Total capital raised was also not fully disclosed in today’s announcements for some companies, including LeapXpert and Flare Therapeutics. Where totals were unavailable, I marked them as not disclosed rather than estimating.

